|
In collaboration with leading companies, states and environmental organizations, the Center for Clean Air Policy has formed a new national US climate policy dialogue, the Climate Policy Initiative, which provides an off-the-record forum for the necessary learning and stakeholder discussions that are needed to advance a comprehensive national climate policy solution. Goals of this Initiative are to: 1) educate key industry and government officials on the scope of the climate problem; and 2) develop a set of pragmatic near-term and longer-term mitigation and adaptation solutions for climate change in the United States. The analytical work and policy ideas developed through this Initiative can be used by participants to craft an effective and politically viable national climate strategy for consideration by the next Administration, whichever political party prevails.
CCAP held a meeting of its multi-stakeholder Climate Policy Initiative Dialogue on May 2-3, 2007.
Presentations included the following:
Project Roadmap & Meeting Overview
|
Ned Helme, Center for Clean Air Policy
|
view |
Carbon Price Working Group - Progress to Date
|
Stacey Davis, Center for Clean Air Policy
|
view |
Potential Transportation Measures - Initial Recommendations from PAMs Work Group
|
Steve Winkelman, Center for Clean Air Policy
|
view |
Cost Containment Concerns and Toolbox
|
Stacey Davis, Center for Clean Air Policy
|
view |
New Coal Policies and Measures
|
Conrad Schneider, Clean Air Task Force
|
view |
Trade-offs in Allocating Allowances for CO2 Emissions
|
Terry Dinan, Congressional Budget Office
|
view |
Advanced Technology Working Group Report
|
Dan Klein, 21st Strategies
|
view |
EPA Review of Climate Mitigation Costs in 2020
|
Francisco de la Chesnaye, EPA
|
view |
Analysis of GHG Mitigation
|
|
view |
A Tool for Forecasting Climate Change Policy Effects on the Natural Gas Industry
|
|
view |
CCAP held a meeting of its multi-stakeholder Climate Policy Dialogue on February 13-14, 2007. Meeting Summary
Presentations included the following:
Suggested Design Principles and Criteria
|
Stacey Davis, Center for Clean Air Policy
|
view |
Green house Gas Stabilization Targets: Near Term Implications for the US
|
Jake Schmidt, Center for Clean Air Policy
|
view |
Power and Transportation Sector Options, Day 1
|
Stacey Davis, Center for Clean Air Policy
|
view |
Climate Impacts and Temperature Concentrations
|
Rachel Warren, UEA/Tyndall Centre
|
view |
A National Clean Energy Approach to Climate Change
|
|
view |
Power and Transportation Sector Options, Day 2
|
Steve Winkelman, Center for Clean Air Policy
|
view |
European Approach to Solving Climate Change
|
Rob Donkers, European Commission
|
view |
CCAP held a meeting of its multi-stakeholder Climate Policy Dialogue on October 4-5, 2006.
Meeting Summary 
Presentations included the following:
Generator-Based vs. Load-Based Caps for the Power Sector
|
Stacey Davis, Center for Clean Air Policy
|
view |
Regulated vs. Deregulated Power Markets: Implications for CO2 Policy
|
Steve Fine, ICF International
|
view |
Fuel Economy Policy: CAFE, Feebates, Etc.
|
David L. Greene, Oak Ridge Laboratory
|
view |
Fuel Consumption, Operational Attributes, and Potential Markets for Plug-in Hybrid Technologies
|
Danilo J. Santini, UChicago Argonne Nat'l Laboratory
|
view |
|
Steve Winkelman, Center for Clean Air Policy
|
view |
Plug-in Hybrids: Background and Analysis
|
Shelby et al, Transportation and Climate Division EPA
|
view |
|
|
view |
CCAP held a meeting of its multi-stakeholder Climate Policy Dialogue on June 6-7, 2006. Selected presentations are provided below:
GHG Reduction and Technology Scenarios to Stabilize Radiative Forcing |
Jae Edmonds, Joint Global Change Research Institute
|
view |
Stabilization Targets: What are the Long- and Near-term Implications? |
Heejin (Jin) Lee, Center for Clean Air Policy |
view |
Get Dirty or Die: Practical Steps for Adapting Infastructure Investments to Save Money and Save Lives in the Warmer World
|
Kurt Triplett, King County, Washgington Executive Office
|
view |
Managing Risk in an Uncertain Climate
|
Christopher Walker, SwissRe
|
view |
Controlling Emissions from Industry: Some Key Design Issues
|
Stacey Davis, Center for Clean Air Policy |
view |
Transportation and GHG Trading: Rethinking Options for Engaging the Problem Sector
|
Steve Winkelman, Center for Clean Air Policy
|
view |
Why Go Nuclear...Why Now!
|
|
view |
Is there a More Ambitious Centerist Formula for Climate Legislation?
|
David Doniger, Natural Resources Defense Council
|
view |
Allowance Allocation: Is there a Prefered Approach?
|
Steve Fine, ICF International
|
view |
Developing Country Actions: Current and Potential Further Efforts in Major Countries
|
Jake Schmidt, Center for Clean Air Policy
|
view |
Update on Bingaman and Domenici White Paper
|
Jonathan Black, U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources
|
view |
[TOP · BACK]
CCAP held a meeting of its Air Quality Dialogue on June 8, 2006. Presentations included the following:
Residual O3 and PM 2.5 Nonattainment After CAIR/CAMR/CAVR
|
Tyler Fox, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
|
view |
Supplemental Analyses and Weight of Evidence
|
Tyler Fox, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
|
view |
PM and Haze Modeling in the Southeastern U.S.
|
|
view |
Regional Air Quality Planning in the Upper Midwest
|
Michael Koerber, Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium
|
view |
Control Measures:Planning and Strategy
|
Christopher Recchia, Ozone Transport Commission
|
view |
[TOP
· BACK]
|